Bible Commentaries

2 Kings 25:1-3. Jerusalem again besieged.

Nebuchadnezzar … came … against Jerusalem — Incensed by the revolt of Zedekiah, the Assyrian despot determined to put an end to the perfidious and inconstant monarchy of Judea. This chapter narrates his third and last invasion, which he conducted in person at the head of an immense army, levied out of all the tributary nations under his sway. Having overrun the northern parts of the country and taken almost all the fenced cities (Jeremiah 34:7), he marched direct to Jerusalem to invest it. The date of the beginning as well as the end of the siege is here carefully marked (compare Ezekiel 24:1; Jeremiah 39:1; Jeremiah 52:4-6); from which it appears, that, with a brief interruption caused by Nebuchadnezzar‘s marching to oppose the Egyptians who were coming to its relief but who retreated without fighting, the siege lasted a year and a half. So long a resistance was owing, not to the superior skill and valor of the Jewish soldiers, but to the strength of the city fortifications, on which the king too confidently relied (compare Jeremiah 21:1-14; 37:1-38:28).

pitched against it, and … built forts — rather, perhaps, drew lines of circumvallation, with a ditch to prevent any going out of the city. On this rampart were erected his military engines for throwing missiles into the city.

on the ninth day of the fourth month the famine prevailed — In consequence of the close and protracted blockade, the inhabitants were reduced to dreadful extremities; and under the maddening influence of hunger, the most inhuman atrocities were perpetrated (Lamentations 2:20, Lamentations 2:22; Lamentations 4:9, Lamentations 4:10; Ezekiel 5:10). This was a fulfillment of the prophetic denunciations threatened on the apostasy of the chosen people (Leviticus 26:29; Deuteronomy 28:53-57; Jeremiah 15:2; Jeremiah 27:13; Ezekiel 4:16).

2 Kings 25:4-30. Zedekiah taken.

the city was broken up — that is, a breach was effected, as we are elsewhere informed, in a part of the wall belonging to the lower city (2 Chronicles 32:5; 2 Chronicles 33:14).

the men of war fled by night by the way of the gate between two walls, which is by the king‘s garden — The king‘s garden was (Nehemiah 3:15) at the pool of Siloam, that is, at the mouth of the Tyropaeon. A trace of the outermost of these walls appears to be still extant in the rude pathway which crosses the mouth of the Tyropaeon, on a mound hard by the old mulberry tree, which marks the traditional spot of Isaiah‘s martyrdom [Robinson]. It is probable that the besiegers had overlooked this pass.

the king went … toward the plain — that is, the Ghor, or valley of Jordan, estimated at five hours‘ distance from Jerusalem. The plain near Jericho is about eleven or twelve miles broad.

to Riblah — Nebuchadnezzar, having gone from the siege to oppose the auxiliary forces of Pharaoh-hophra, left his generals to carry on the blockade, he himself not returning to the scene of action, but taking up his station at Riblah in the land of Hamath (2 Kings 23:33).

they gave judgment upon him — They, that is, the council (Jeremiah 39:3, Jeremiah 39:13; Daniel 6:7, Daniel 6:8, Daniel 6:12), regarding him as a seditious and rebellious vassal, condemned him for violating his oath and neglecting the announcement of the divine will as made known to him by Jeremiah (compare Jeremiah 32:5; Jeremiah 34:2; Jeremiah 38:17). His sons and the nobles who had joined in his flight were slain before his eyes (Jeremiah 39:6; Jeremiah 52:10). In conformity with Eastern ideas, which consider a blind man incapable of ruling, his eyes were put out, and being put in chains, he was carried to perpetual imprisonment in Babylon (Jeremiah 52:11), which, though he came to it, as Ezekiel had foretold, he did not see (Jeremiah 32:5; Ezekiel 12:13; Ezekiel 17:16).

came Nebuzar-adan — (compare Jeremiah 52:12). In attempting to reconcile these two passages, it must be supposed either that, though he had set out on the seventh, he did not arrive in Jerusalem till the tenth, or that he did not put his orders in execution till that day. His office as captain of the guard (Genesis 37:36; Genesis 39:1) called him to execute the awards of justice on criminals; and hence, although not engaged in the siege of Jerusalem (Jeremiah 39:13), Nebuzar-adan was dispatched to rase the city, to plunder the temple, to lay both in ruins, demolish the fortifications, and transport the inhabitants to Babylon. The most eminent of these were taken to the king at Riblah (2 Kings 25:27) and executed, as instigators and abettors of the rebellion, or otherwise obnoxious to the Assyrian government. In their number were Seraiah, the high priest, grandfather of Ezra (Ezra 7:1), his sagan or deputy, a priest of the second order (Jeremiah 21:2; Jeremiah 29:25, Jeremiah 29:29; Jeremiah 37:3).

the three keepers of the door — not mere porters, but officers of high trust among the Levites (2 Kings 22:4; 1 Chronicles 9:26).

five men of them that were in the king‘s presence — that is, who belonged to the royal retinue. It is probable that there were five at first, and that other two were found afterwards (Jeremiah 52:25).

made Gedaliah … ruler — The people permitted to remain were, besides the king‘s daughters, a few court attendants and others (Jeremiah 40:7) too insignificant to be removed, only the peasantry who could till the land and dress the vineyards. Gedaliah was Jeremiah‘s friend (Jeremiah 26:24), and having, by the prophet‘s counsel, probably fled from the city as abandoned of God, he surrendered himself to the conqueror (Jeremiah 38:2, Jeremiah 38:17), and being promoted to the government of Judea, fixed his provincial court at Mizpeh. He was well qualified to surmount the difficulties of ruling at such a crisis. Many of the fugitive Jews, as well as the soldiers of Zedekiah who had accompanied the king in his flight to the plains of Jericho, left their retreats (Jeremiah 40:11, Jeremiah 40:12) and flocked around the governor; who having counseled them to submit, promised them on complying with this condition, security on oath that they would retain their possessions and enjoy the produce of their land (Jeremiah 40:9).

of the seed royal, came, and ten men with him, and smote Gedaliah — He had found refuge with Baalis, king of the Ammonites, and he returned with a bad design, being either instigated by envy of a governor not descended from the house of David, or bribed by Baalis to murder Gedaliah. The generous governor, though apprised of his intentions, refused to credit the report, much less to sanction the proposal made by an attached friend to cut off Ishmael. The consequence was, that he was murdered by this same Ishmael, when entertaining him in his own house (Jeremiah 41:1).

came to Egypt — In spite of Jeremiah‘s dissuasions (Jeremiah 43:7, Jeremiah 43:8) they settled in various cities of that country (Jeremiah 44:1).

seven and thirtieth year of the captivity of Jehoiachin — corresponding with the year of Nebuchadnezzar‘s death, and his son Evil-merodach‘s ascension to the throne.

Evil-merodach … did lift up the head of Jehoiachin … and spake kindly — gave him liberty upon parole. This kindly feeling is said to have originated in a familiar acquaintance formed in prison, in which Evil-merodach had lain till his father‘s death, on account of some malversation while acting as regent during Nebuchadnezzar‘s seven years‘ illness (Daniel 4:32, Daniel 4:33). But doubtless the improvement in Zedekiah‘s condition is to be traced to the overruling providence and grace of Him who still cherished purposes of love to the house of David (2 Samuel 7:14, 2 Samuel 7:15).

Jehoiachin … did eat … continually before him — According to an ancient usage in Eastern courts, had a seat at the royal table on great days, and had a stated provision granted him for the maintenance of his exiled court.