Bible Commentaries

Ruth 2:7

I do not hear Ruth stand upon the terms of her better education, or wealthy parentage; but now that God hath called her to want, she scorns not to lay her hand unto all homely services, and thinks it no disparagement to find her bread in other men's fields.

—Bishop Hall.

"American girls," says Mr. Kipling in From Sea to Sea (i. p6), "develop greatly when a catastrophe arrives, and the man of many millions goes up or goes down, and his daughters take to stenography or typewriting. I have heard many tales of heroism from the lips of girls who counted the principals among their friends. The crash came: Mamie or Hattie or Sadie gave up their maid, their carriages and candy, and with No2Remington and a stout heart set about earning their daily bread."

Working in the quiet village, or in the distant field, women may be as pure and modest, men as highminded and well-bred, and both as full of the fear of God, and the thought that God's eye is upon them, as if they were in a place or station where they had nothing to do but to watch over the salvation of their own souls; the meadow and the harvest-field need not be, as they too often are, places for temptation and defilement, where the old too often teach the young not to fear God and keep themselves pure, but to copy their coarse jests and foul language, and listen to stories which had better be buried for ever in the dirt out of which they spring. You know what I mean. You know what field-work too often is. Read the book of Ruth 2:8

Boaz in this book is a type of Christ, and Ruth is the type of the Christian soul. And the command given by Boaz to Ruth to glean in his fields, and not to glean in any other field, is very emphatic, and is repeated afterwards by Naomi.

I. Where are we to Glean?—We are warned that there is only one field in which we must glean—the field of Jesus Christ; the field of His Church; the field purchased by His Death and Passion; the field watered by the blood of His martyrs; the field which for nineteen hundred years has produced its glorious harvest of countless saints.

David says, "Those that be planted in the house of the Lord shall flourish in the courts of our God". We must first be planted there by the Sacrament of Baptism. But this is not all. We must remain there, and grow there, and flourish there, and glean there, if we are to fulfil the commands of Holy Writ.

II. What are we to Glean?—Even those who are gleaning in Christ's Church need to be reminded that they are to seek those things which are best.

What are we gleaning? 1. Are we making the best use of our labour? Are we picking up the largest, and finest, and ripest ears of corn? The Sacraments of the Church, these are the full, ripe ears, the great means of grace. Do we avail ourselves of them in all their fullness.

2. Are we picking up those stalks of corn from which the birds have plucked the ears, which are, therefore, only husks and straw? What are our prayers and devotions? Are they merely formal words of the lips, and not feelings of the heart; the form of devotion without the spirit?

3. Are we picking up noxious weeds which grow among the com, and making up our sheaves with them?

St. Paul tells us some of the things which we should be gleaning in the fields of Christian virtue, when he says, "Whatsoever things are true," etc.

III. How are we Gleaning?—With steady perseverance, with real industry; or in a fitful, idle, slothful way?

—A. G. Mortimer, The Church's Lessons for the Christian Year, part iv. p344.

Ruth 2:9

Let us consider what that thing is which we call years of discretion. The young man is past his tutors, and arrived at the bondage of a caitiff spirit; he is run from discipline, and is let loose to passion; the man by this time hath wit enough to choose his vice, to act his best, to court his mistress, to talk confidently, and ignorantly, and perpetually, to despise his betters, to deny nothing to his appetites, to do things that, when he is indeed a Ruth 2:15

Innocence and haycocks do not always go together.—Macaulay.

References.—II:15.—Spurgeon, Sermons, vol. xlvi. No2585. II:15 , 16.—Ibid. vol. viii. No464.

Ruth 2:16 with2:12

Charity was so well matched with his religion, without which good words are but hypocrisy.

—Bishop Hall.

Ruth 2:17

I. Notice the good providence of God, illustrated in the story of Ruth and Naomi. We are shown here how true is that verse of the Ruth 2:18

Discussing, in Arcady: For Better or Worse (pp225 f.), the effect of the workhouse system in rural England, Dr. Jessopp observes: "It does people good to be brought into daily intercourse with the aged and the weak and the needy. It is bad for us if our sense of pity and our gentle sympathies are never appealed to. We get hard and coarse and selfish, that way.... But for good or evil there stands the fact that in our villages we have very little to do with or for the old people who are a link with the past, and very little occasion to make any sacrifices for others, and still less are we called upon to interest ourselves in their sorrows. The law of the land has come in and taken out of our hands the duty of looking after the poor and aged."

References.—II:19.—J. McNeill, Regent Square Pulpit, vol. ii. p97. T. Champness, New Coins from Old Gold, p142. II:20.—S. Cox, The Booh of Ruth , p164. III:1-18.—Ibid. p105. H. W. Webb-Peploe, The Life of Privilege, p130.